ACSI Research Fellow Program

Association of Christian Schools International / Thought Leadership / ACSI Research Fellow Program
Program Overview

The Research Fellowship program at ACSI offers a unique opportunity for talented researchers to contribute to advancing the field of Christian education while addressing critical global challenges. By fostering collaboration, knowledge exchange, and innovative research, the program aims to make a significant impact on the world stage.

Program Aims:
  • Create a vibrant and inclusive international research community.
  • Foster collaboration, knowledge exchange, and innovative solutions to address both US and global challenges through research projects in Christian education.
 
Program Oversight:
  • The fellows will collaboratively work with ACSI’s research department and Thought Leadership and the Research Director will oversee the program.

 

ACSI Fellows Collaborate on Research to Advance Faith-Based Education

ACSI Fellows collaborate with the Thought Leadership team (Research Department) to develop research and Working Papers on important topics in education, spirituality, and culture, focusing on their impact within the realm of Christian education. Their work addresses current trends and challenges, offering valuable insights for advancing faith-based learning.

Research in Brief

RiB is a biannual publication by ACSI, aimed at sharing the latest research findings and insights on the Christian school sector. It is available exclusively to ACSI member school and is managed by ACSI Director of Research.

 

Current Fellows
Lynn Swaner

 

Lynn Swaner Ed.D.

President of Cardus USA – ACSI Senior Research Fellow
Dr. Lynn Swaner is the President, US at Cardus, a non-partisan think tank dedicated to clarifying and strengthening, through research and dialogue, the ways in which society’s institutions can work together for the common good. She also serves as a Senior Fellow for the Association of Christian Schools International (ACSI). Dr. Swaner is the editor or lead author of numerous books, including Future Ready: Innovative Missions and Models in Christian Education (Cardus & ACSI, 2022); Flourishing Together: A Christian Vision for Students, Educators, and Schools (Eerdmans, 2021); and MindShift: Catalyzing Change in Christian Education (ACSI, 2019). Dr. Swaner holds a doctorate in organizational leadership from Teachers College, Columbia University and a diploma in strategy and innovation from University of Oxford’s Saïd Business School. She previously served as a professor of education and a Christian school leader in New York.
Matthew Lee

 

Matthew Lee, Ph.D.

Clinical Assistant Professor of Economics at Kennesaw State University - ACSI Senior Research Fellow
Matthew Lee is Clinical Assistant Professor of Economics at Kennesaw State University. He previously served as the Director of Research at the Association of Christian Schools International, where he helped develop the Flourishing Faith Index. His peer-reviewed research on Christian education has appeared in the Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Journal of Religious and Health, International Journal of Educational Development, and the Journal of Religious Education. He is co-author of Future Ready (ACSI/Cardus 2022) and co-editor of Religious Liberty and Education (Rowman & Littlefield 2020). He earned his Ph.D. in education policy at the University of Arkansas.
Francis Ben

 

Francis Ben, Ph.D.

Associate Professor & Head of Postgraduate Coursework and Research at Tabor College Adelaide Australia – ACSI Global Research Fellow
Francis has more than 30 combined years of experience in secondary and tertiary education. He has an undergraduate qualification in Civil Engineering, and postgraduate qualifications in Physics and Education. At secondary schools in North Carolina, he taught mathematics and physics subjects. He also taught Physics, Research Methods, and Education-related subjects at the undergraduate and postgraduate levels in Australia, Singapore, Indonesia, and the Philippines. His research and publications include Physics Education, Educational Measurement, large-scale studies (e.g., PISA). He is currently Head of Postgraduate Programs and Research in the Education Faculty at Tabor College of Higher Education in South Australia.
Alison Heap Johnson

 

Alison Heape Johnson

PhD candidate at the University of Arkansas – ACSI Junior Research Fellow
Alison is a PhD candidate and Distinguished Doctoral Fellow at the University of Arkansas where she studies education policy, with research interests in school finance, school choice, and teacher/administrator pipelines. She previously taught in both public and Christian schools and has a bachelor’s degree in music education and a master’s degree in teaching English as a second language. She and her husband Blake reside in Arkansas with their newborn daughter and enjoy exploring the beauty of the Natural State and gathering with their church where Blake is a pastoral resident.
Become A Fellow
    Eligibility:
    • Understanding of Christian education.
    • Strong academic credentials (e.g., relevant degrees, publications, minimum a Ph.D. candidate in education programs for Junior Fellow and a Ph.D. or Ed.D. for Senior Fellow).
    • Demonstrated research excellence.
    • Experience in international research collaboration.
    • Excellent English communication skills.
    • Minimum five years experience of doing research.
     
    Nomination and selection process:
    • The selection of the fellows is done through ACSI’s internal nomination.
    Blog

    Forming Students for the Digital World Ahead

    Oct 20, 2026, 08:56 by Christina Crook, Founder and CEO of JOMO
    Even as schools work to address them, a new generation of technologies is already emerging. Artificial intelligence is becoming more conversational and personalized. Smart glasses can discreetly record the world around us. Brain-computer interfaces are moving from science fiction into human trials. This raises a bigger question: How do we form students not simply to navigate today's technologies, but to live wisely and faithfully in the digital world ahead?

    It’s 10:15 on a Tuesday morning, and already you’re thinking about technology. 

     

    The Grade 8s are in the bathroom on their phones again. 

     

    Ms. Wilson stopped you in the hallway. She’s exhausted from policing devices and trying to compete for her students’ attention. 

     

    Another teacher wants to know what to do about the assignment that was clearly written by ChatGPT. Is it cheating? Is it assistance? How can she even tell anymore? 

     

    Yesterday, a parent emailed because her daughter has been spending hours talking to an AI chatbot. She wants to know what the school thinks. 

     

    And that technology policy your team spent months developing? It already feels out of date. 

     

    These are the very real challenges facing school leaders right now. 

     

    But even as schools work to address them, a new generation of technologies is already emerging. Artificial intelligence is becoming more conversational and personalized. Smart glasses can discreetly record the world around us. Brain-computer interfaces are moving from science fiction into human trials. 

     

    Which raises a much bigger question: How do we form students not simply to navigate the technologies of today, but to live wisely and faithfully in the digital world ahead? 
     

    Preparing for the Future of Technology 

     

    Technology is changing faster than schools can write policies for it. 

     

    One year, we’re debating smartphones in classrooms. Next, we’re developing guidelines for generative AI. Before those practices are fully established, something new arrives with a new set of possibilities and ethical questions. 

     

    For school leaders, it can feel like a never-ending game of catch-up. And that’s the problem. 

     

    If our primary approach is reactive—waiting for a technology to disrupt our classrooms and then creating a rule for it—we will always be one step behind. What if, instead of trying to prepare students for every new technology, we prepared them to meet any technology with wisdom? 

     

    Christian schools have a unique opportunity to take a different approach: forming students with wisdom that can outlast any particular device. 
     

    Asking More Than “Is It Good or Bad?” 

     

    When a new technology arrives, our first instinct is often to ask: Is it good or bad? Should we allow it or ban it? 

     

    Christian formation gives us better questions. 

     

    What is this technology asking us to love? What habits is it forming in us? What might it make easier and what might we lose in exchange? Does it help us become more attentive to God and one another, or less? 

     

    Augustine’s concept of “ordered loves” offers a helpful framework. He understood that our lives are shaped not simply by what we know, but by what we love and whether those loves are rightly ordered. 

     

    Technology can be a wonderful expression of God-given human creativity. But when convenience, entertainment, efficiency, or even productivity begin to displace God, community, embodied relationships, meaningful work, and rest, our loves can become disordered. 

     

    This gives Christian educators a richer way to evaluate technology, not simply by asking what a tool can do, but by considering what its use is forming us to become. 

     

    This is also why Christian digital formation needs to move from values to virtues. Values help students identify what matters; virtues are the habits of character that help them live accordingly. The goal isn't simply to teach students to value wisdom, attention, or love, but to give them opportunities to practice becoming wise, attentive, and loving people. 
     

    Practicing Discernment Now 

     

    The concern with AI isn't simply whether it gives students inaccurate information or makes cheating easier. We also need to ask what happens when students begin outsourcing the very processes through which wisdom develops. 

     

    Learning requires curiosity, struggle, conversation, and perseverance. Sometimes the struggle itself is the point. Wrestling with an idea, sitting with uncertainty, finding the words to express what we think, listening to someone who sees the world differently—these experiences form us. 

     

    As Paul Matthews, author of Wise AI, has often reminded educators, formation is not something that happens to students in spite of their effort but through their effort. When we remove the struggle, we risk removing the very conditions in which maturity is formed. 

     

    So before asking, Could AI do this for my students?, we should also ask: What does doing this themselves develop in them? 

     

    The same is true beyond the classroom. Formation has always happened through relationships—with parents, teachers, friends, churches, and communities. As AI companions become increasingly capable of offering personalized conversation, emotional reassurance, and even ethical guidance, young people will need the wisdom to discern not simply whether an answer is helpful, but who and what they are allowing to shape them. 

     

    Smart glasses raise different questions. As recording becomes increasingly invisible, young people are entering a world where they may not always know when their words or actions are being captured. Yet human beings need spaces where we can make mistakes, ask foolish questions, repent, reconcile, grow, and become someone new without every imperfect moment becoming part of a permanent digital record. 

     

    These aren't reasons to fear emerging technology. They are reasons to practice discernment before the next technology arrives. 

     

    A Phone-Free Classroom Is Only the Beginning 

     

    Good policies matter. They establish boundaries and create conditions where learning and relationships can flourish. But policy alone cannot form students. A phone-free classroom creates space. The deeper question is what fills it. 

     

    Conversation. Wonder. Creativity. Prayer. Deep work. Friendship. Adults who model what it looks like to give another person their full attention. 

     

    Digital flourishing isn't primarily about helping students avoid harmful technologies. It's about helping them become the kind of people who can use any technology wisely. 

     

    Students need opportunities to experience boredom without immediately escaping it, solve problems without outsourcing when it becomes challenging, create rather than endlessly consume, and engage in face-to-face conversation.  

     

    Young people need adults who show them that efficiency isn’t the highest good and that being fully present to another person is worth the “inconvenience.” 

     

    These practices cultivate something no technology policy can produce on its own: Christ-like character. 

     

    We don't know exactly which technologies today's students will encounter five, ten, or twenty years from now. We don't need to. 

     

    Our task is not to predict every technology coming next. It is to form young people who are ready to meet whatever comes with wisdom, courage, love, and a deeply rooted understanding of who—and whose—they are.